llama.cppvsOSEM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | OSEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #8 of 11 in Event Management |
| GitHub stars | 132 699 | 929 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 244 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1466 | 0 |
| Latest release | b11980 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 47/100 for OSEM, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1466 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for OSEM.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; OSEM needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 244 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →OSEM details →