llama.cppvsOpenSlides
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | OpenSlides | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #3 of 3 in Conference Management |
| GitHub stars | 132 689 | 661 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 234 | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1463 | 13 |
| Latest release | b11977 · 29 Oct 2026 | 4.3.6 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 56/100 for OpenSlides, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1463 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for OpenSlides.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; OpenSlides needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 234 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →OpenSlides details →