# llama.cpp vs OpenProject

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | OpenProject |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #3 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 132 714 ✓ | 16 789 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 259 ✓ | +588 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1467 ✓ | 22 |
| Latest release | b11981 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v17.9.4 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 79/100 for OpenProject, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1467 stable releases in the past year, against 22 for OpenProject.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 259 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [OpenProject](https://selfhost.directory/project/openproject) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openproject.md)

## Related comparisons

- [OpenProject vs Plane](https://selfhost.directory/compare/openproject-vs-plane)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-openproject