# llama.cpp vs OpenMapTiles

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | OpenMapTiles |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #24 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 132 593 ✓ | 3 211 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 236 ✓ | +41 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1451 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | b11954 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.16 · 18 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | C++ | PLpgSQL |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 65/100 for OpenMapTiles, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1451 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OpenMapTiles.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 236 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [OpenMapTiles](https://selfhost.directory/project/openmaptiles) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openmaptiles.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-openmaptiles