# llama.cpp vs openHop Repeater

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | openHop Repeater |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #2 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 132 674 ✓ | 298 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 317 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1461 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | b11972 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 1.1.4 · 8 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 51/100 for openHop Repeater, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1461 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openHop Repeater.

If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; openHop Repeater needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 317 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [openHop Repeater](https://selfhost.directory/project/openhop-repeater) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openhop-repeater.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-openhop-repeater