# llama.cpp vs Opengeni

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | Opengeni |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #97 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 132 669 ✓ | 212 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 312 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1461 ✓ | 19 |
| Latest release | b11972 · 28 Oct 2026 | opengeni-artifact-runtime-a2d28b536062dfb4dc11c6a6c3f1049da9a70f9d · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 50/100 for Opengeni, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1461 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for Opengeni.

If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; Opengeni needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 312 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [Opengeni](https://selfhost.directory/project/opengeni) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opengeni.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-opengeni