llama.cppvsOpenEMR
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | OpenEMR | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #1 of 5 in Healthcare |
| GitHub stars | 132 689 | 5 555 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 234 | +87 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1464 | 6 |
| Latest release | b11978 · 29 Oct 2026 | v8_5_0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 72/100 for OpenEMR, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1464 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for OpenEMR.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; OpenEMR needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 234 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →OpenEMR details →