# llama.cpp vs OpenCode Manager

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | OpenCode Manager |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #65 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 132 663 ✓ | 906 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 306 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1459 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | b11970 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.1.0 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 55/100 for OpenCode Manager, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1459 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OpenCode Manager.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenCode Manager is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 306 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [OpenCode Manager](https://selfhost.directory/project/opencode-manager) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opencode-manager.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-opencode-manager