# llama.cpp vs openclaw-nerve

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | openclaw-nerve |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #22 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 132 699 ✓ | 873 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 244 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1467 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | b11981 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.5.4 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 56/100 for openclaw-nerve, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1467 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for openclaw-nerve.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 244 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [openclaw-nerve](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw-nerve) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw-nerve.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-openclaw-nerve