# llama.cpp vs open-compute

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | open-compute |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #3 of 7 in Serverless |
| GitHub stars | 132 621 ✓ | 2 365 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 264 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1455 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | b11963 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.3.0 · 10 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 55/100 for open-compute, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1455 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for open-compute.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 264 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [open-compute](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-compute) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-compute.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-open-compute