# llama.cpp vs Omoide

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | Omoide |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #37 of 41 in Photo Management |
| GitHub stars | 132 743 ✓ | 277 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 288 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1468 ✓ | 16 |
| Latest release | b11982 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.7.6 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 40/100 for Omoide, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1468 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Omoide.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 288 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [Omoide](https://selfhost.directory/project/omoide) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omoide.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-omoide