# llama.cpp vs o-spreadsheet

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | o-spreadsheet |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #10 of 10 in Data Management |
| GitHub stars | 132 679 ✓ | 297 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 322 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1461 ✓ | 14 |
| Latest release | b11972 · 28 Oct 2026 | 20.0.5 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 49/100 for o-spreadsheet, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1461 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for o-spreadsheet.

If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; o-spreadsheet needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 322 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [o-spreadsheet](https://selfhost.directory/project/o-spreadsheet) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/o-spreadsheet.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-o-spreadsheet