# llama.cpp vs nzbhydra2

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | nzbhydra2 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #2 of 6 in Feed Aggregator |
| GitHub stars | 132 699 ✓ | 1 742 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 244 ✓ | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1465 ✓ | 23 |
| Latest release | b11979 · 29 Oct 2026 | v9.2.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 60/100 for nzbhydra2, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1465 stable releases in the past year, against 23 for nzbhydra2.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 244 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [nzbhydra2](https://selfhost.directory/project/nzbhydra2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nzbhydra2.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-nzbhydra2