llama.cppvsmultiwoven
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | multiwoven | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #4 of 8 in Data Pipeline |
| GitHub stars | 132 679 | 1 683 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 224 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1462 | 26 |
| Latest release | b11976 · 29 Oct 2026 | v0.136.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 57/100 for multiwoven, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1462 stable releases in the past year, against 26 for multiwoven.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; multiwoven needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 224 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →multiwoven details →