# llama.cpp vs mousehole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | mousehole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #64 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 132 689 ✓ | 318 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 234 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1463 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | b11977 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.5.0 · 20 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 44/100 for mousehole, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1463 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for mousehole.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 234 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [mousehole](https://selfhost.directory/project/mousehole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mousehole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-mousehole