# llama.cpp vs Moodle

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | Moodle |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #1 of 14 in Learning Management System |
| GitHub stars | 132 722 ✓ | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 267 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1467 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | b11981 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | — |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 71/100 for Moodle, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1467 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Moodle.

If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; Moodle needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 267 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [Moodle](https://selfhost.directory/project/moodle) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/moodle.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-moodle