# llama.cpp vs Miru

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | Miru |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #78 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 132 722 ✓ | 187 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 267 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1467 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | b11981 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | cross-platform-2026-08-30 · 30 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 43/100 for Miru, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1467 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Miru.

If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; Miru needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 267 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [Miru](https://selfhost.directory/project/miru) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/miru.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-miru