llama.cppvsLXC
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | LXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #1 of 2 in Containers |
| GitHub stars | 132 663 | 5 288 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 306 | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1458 | 2 |
| Latest release | b11969 · 28 Oct 2026 | v7.0.0 · 30 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | C++ | C |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 70/100 for LXC, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1458 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for LXC.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; LXC needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 306 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →LXC details →