# llama.cpp vs LubeLogger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | LubeLogger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 132 728 ✓ | 2 926 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 273 ✓ | +69 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1468 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | b11982 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1468 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for LubeLogger.

If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 273 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [LubeLogger](https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-lubelogger