# llama.cpp vs Local Deep Research

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | Local Deep Research |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #11 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 132 674 ✓ | 9 437 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 317 ✓ | +314 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1461 ✓ | 24 |
| Latest release | b11972 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.10.7 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 74/100 for Local Deep Research, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1461 stable releases in the past year, against 24 for Local Deep Research.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 317 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [Local Deep Research](https://selfhost.directory/project/local-deep-research) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/local-deep-research.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-local-deep-research