livekitvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| livekit | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 21 902 | 12 826 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +803 | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
livekit scores 80/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.
livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
If you want the quickest setup, zookeeper is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.
livekit is growing faster right now (+803 stars in 30 days).
livekit details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep livekit, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with