# livekit vs Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | livekit | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 21 899 ✓ | 16 062 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +824 ✓ | +247 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 31 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

livekit and Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) score the same (80/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for livekit.

If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.

livekit is growing faster right now (+824 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [livekit](https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit.md)
- [Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/livekit-vs-zed-attack-proxy-zap