# livekit vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | livekit | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 21 891 ✓ | 15 908 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +816 ✓ | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

livekit scores 80/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.

livekit is growing faster right now (+816 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [livekit](https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/livekit-vs-transfersh