# livekit vs tobab

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | livekit | tobab |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 37/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #34 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 21 913 ✓ | 155 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +814 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

livekit scores 80/100 against 37/100 for tobab, so it is the safer default.

livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for tobab.

If you want the quickest setup, tobab is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.

livekit is growing faster right now (+814 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [livekit](https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit.md)
- [tobab](https://selfhost.directory/project/tobab) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tobab.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/livekit-vs-tobab