# livekit vs R2R

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | livekit | R2R |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #6 of 7 in RAG |
| GitHub stars | 21 915 ✓ | 8 049 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +816 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

livekit scores 80/100 against 59/100 for R2R, so it is the safer default.

livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for R2R.

If you want the quickest setup, R2R is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.

livekit is growing faster right now (+816 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [livekit](https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit.md)
- [R2R](https://selfhost.directory/project/r2r) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/r2r.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/livekit-vs-r2r