# livekit vs Questarr

> Two self-hosted [Media Server projects](https://selfhost.directory/media-server), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | livekit | Questarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #38 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 21 891 ✓ | 703 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +816 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.5.0 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

livekit scores 80/100 against 56/100 for Questarr, so it is the safer default.

livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Questarr.

If you want the quickest setup, Questarr is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.

livekit is growing faster right now (+816 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [livekit](https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit.md)
- [Questarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/questarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/questarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/livekit-vs-questarr