# livekit vs quackback

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | livekit | quackback |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #9 of 14 in Customer Support |
| GitHub stars | 21 906 ✓ | 331 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +807 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.14.1 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

livekit scores 80/100 against 50/100 for quackback, so it is the safer default.

livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for quackback.

If you want the quickest setup, quackback is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.

livekit is growing faster right now (+807 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [livekit](https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit.md)
- [quackback](https://selfhost.directory/project/quackback) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/quackback.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/livekit-vs-quackback