# livekit vs QFieldCloud

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | livekit | QFieldCloud |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 21 913 ✓ | 246 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +814 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v26.29 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

livekit scores 80/100 against 54/100 for QFieldCloud, so it is the safer default.

livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QFieldCloud.

livekit is growing faster right now (+814 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [livekit](https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit.md)
- [QFieldCloud](https://selfhost.directory/project/qfieldcloud) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qfieldcloud.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/livekit-vs-qfieldcloud