livekitvsProwlarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| livekit | Prowlarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 2 in Indexer |
| GitHub stars | 21 913 | 7 463 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +814 | +203 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 24 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.7.0.5723 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | C# |
Which one should you pick?
livekit scores 80/100 against 74/100 for Prowlarr, so it is the safer default.
Prowlarr ships more often: 24 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for livekit.
If you want the quickest setup, Prowlarr is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.
livekit is growing faster right now (+814 stars in 30 days).
livekit details →Prowlarr details →
Swap a project
Keep livekit, compare it with
Keep Prowlarr, compare it with