# livekit vs Portainer

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | livekit | Portainer |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 44 in Container Management |
| GitHub stars | 21 897 | 38 736 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +822 ✓ | +187 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.45.3 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Zlib |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

livekit scores 80/100 against 77/100 for Portainer, so it is the safer default.

Portainer ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for livekit.

If you want the quickest setup, Portainer is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.

livekit is growing faster right now (+822 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [livekit](https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit.md)
- [Portainer](https://selfhost.directory/project/portainer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/portainer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/livekit-vs-portainer