# livekit vs PhotoMigrator

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | livekit | PhotoMigrator |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #21 of 41 in Photo Management |
| GitHub stars | 21 899 ✓ | 268 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +824 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.7.0 · 19 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

livekit scores 80/100 against 50/100 for PhotoMigrator, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, PhotoMigrator is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.

livekit is growing faster right now (+824 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [livekit](https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit.md)
- [PhotoMigrator](https://selfhost.directory/project/photomigrator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photomigrator.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/livekit-vs-photomigrator