# livekit vs Operant

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | livekit | Operant |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #169 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 21 916 ✓ | 446 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +817 ✓ | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | desktop-candidate-2026-09-28-08e65ea · 28 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

livekit scores 80/100 against 39/100 for Operant, so it is the safer default.

livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Operant.

livekit is growing faster right now (+817 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [livekit](https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit.md)
- [Operant](https://selfhost.directory/project/operant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/operant.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/livekit-vs-operant