# livekit vs namer

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | livekit | namer |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #19 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 21 897 ✓ | 332 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +822 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.19.20 · 25 May 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

livekit scores 80/100 against 49/100 for namer, so it is the safer default.

livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for namer.

If you want the quickest setup, namer is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.

livekit is growing faster right now (+822 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [livekit](https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit.md)
- [namer](https://selfhost.directory/project/namer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/namer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/livekit-vs-namer