livekitvsmuxarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| livekit | muxarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #85 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 21 897 | 185 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +822 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 20 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.9.13 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | C# |
Which one should you pick?
livekit scores 80/100 against 47/100 for muxarr, so it is the safer default.
muxarr ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for livekit.
If you want the quickest setup, muxarr is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.
livekit is growing faster right now (+822 stars in 30 days).
livekit details →muxarr details →
Swap a project
Keep livekit, compare it with
Keep muxarr, compare it with