# livekit vs motionEye

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | livekit | motionEye |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 21 912 ✓ | 4 721 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +813 ✓ | +36 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

livekit scores 80/100 against 65/100 for motionEye, so it is the safer default.

livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.

livekit is growing faster right now (+813 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [livekit](https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit.md)
- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/livekit-vs-motioneye