livekitvsMCSManager
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| livekit | MCSManager | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #8 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 21 900 | 5 004 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +801 | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 20 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 | v10.22.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
livekit scores 80/100 against 68/100 for MCSManager, so it is the safer default.
MCSManager ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for livekit.
If you want the quickest setup, MCSManager is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.
livekit is growing faster right now (+801 stars in 30 days).
livekit details →MCSManager details →
Swap a project
Keep livekit, compare it with
Keep MCSManager, compare it with