# Livebook vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Livebook | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Data Science | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 5 897 | 132 699 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +25 | +3 244 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 1465 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.19.10 · 17 Sept 2026 | b11979 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Elixir | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 69/100 for Livebook, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1465 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Livebook.

If you want the quickest setup, Livebook is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 244 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Livebook](https://selfhost.directory/project/livebook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/livebook.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/livebook-vs-llamacpp