litellmvsZabbix
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| litellm | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 62 250 | 6 519 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 743 | +108 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 111 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.106.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go Template |
Which one should you pick?
litellm scores 88/100 against 75/100 for Zabbix, so it is the safer default.
litellm ships more often: 111 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.
If you want the quickest setup, litellm is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.
litellm is growing faster right now (+2 743 stars in 30 days).
litellm details →Zabbix details →
Swap a project
Keep litellm, compare it with
Keep Zabbix, compare it with