# litellm vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | litellm | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 62 265 | 89 727 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 690 ✓ | +2 388 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 111 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | v1.106.6 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

litellm scores 88/100 against 86/100 for World Monitor, so it is the safer default.

litellm ships more often: 111 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.

If you want the quickest setup, litellm is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.

## Details

- [litellm](https://selfhost.directory/project/litellm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/litellm.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/litellm-vs-world-monitor