litellmvsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| litellm | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 124 in AI | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 62 283 | 1 719 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 708 | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 111 | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.106.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
litellm scores 88/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
litellm ships more often: 111 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
litellm is growing faster right now (+2 708 stars in 30 days).
litellm details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep litellm, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with