# litellm vs Urbit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | litellm | Urbit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 124 in AI | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 62 283 ✓ | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 708 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 111 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.106.6 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | hoon |

## Which one should you pick?

litellm scores 88/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.

litellm ships more often: 111 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.

If you want the quickest setup, litellm is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

litellm is growing faster right now (+2 708 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [litellm](https://selfhost.directory/project/litellm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/litellm.md)
- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/litellm-vs-urbit