# litellm vs UrBackup

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | litellm | UrBackup |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #18 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 62 216 ✓ | 943 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 709 ✓ | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 109 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.106.5 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.5.38 · 30 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

litellm scores 88/100 against 60/100 for UrBackup, so it is the safer default.

litellm ships more often: 109 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UrBackup.

litellm is growing faster right now (+2 709 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [litellm](https://selfhost.directory/project/litellm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/litellm.md)
- [UrBackup](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbackup) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbackup.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/litellm-vs-urbackup