litellmvsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| litellm | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 62 244 | 13 307 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 737 | +301 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 109 | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.106.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
litellm scores 88/100 against 78/100 for Stash, so it is the safer default.
litellm ships more often: 109 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; litellm needs more configuration.
litellm is growing faster right now (+2 737 stars in 30 days).
litellm details →Stash details →
Swap a project
Keep litellm, compare it with
Keep Stash, compare it with