# litellm vs OpenWA

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | litellm | OpenWA |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #2 of 19 in API Management |
| GitHub stars | 62 216 ✓ | 16 328 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 709 ✓ | +322 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 109 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.106.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.26.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

litellm scores 88/100 against 77/100 for OpenWA, so it is the safer default.

litellm ships more often: 109 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for OpenWA.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenWA is easier to run; litellm needs more configuration.

litellm is growing faster right now (+2 709 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [litellm](https://selfhost.directory/project/litellm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/litellm.md)
- [OpenWA](https://selfhost.directory/project/openwa) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openwa.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/litellm-vs-openwa