list-syncvsStash
Two self-hosted Media Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| list-sync | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #79 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 341 | 13 308 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +302 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 7 |
| Latest release | v0.6.6 · 11 Dec 2025 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 48/100 for list-sync, so it is the safer default.
Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for list-sync.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; list-sync needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).
list-sync details →Stash details →All Media Management projects →