# Liquidsoap vs PaddleOCR

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Liquidsoap | PaddleOCR |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 4 in OCR |
| GitHub stars | 1 743 | 91 943 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +502 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | rolling-release-v2.5.x · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | OCaml | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 62/100 for Liquidsoap, so it is the safer default.

Liquidsoap ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PaddleOCR.

If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; Liquidsoap needs more configuration.

PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+502 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Liquidsoap](https://selfhost.directory/project/liquidsoap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/liquidsoap.md)
- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/liquidsoap-vs-paddleocr