# LinuxCNC vs Telegraf

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LinuxCNC | Telegraf |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #9 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 2 513 | 17 885 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 | +54 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.9.10 · 3 Jul 2026 | v1.40.2 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Telegraf scores 78/100 against 64/100 for LinuxCNC, so it is the safer default.

Telegraf ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for LinuxCNC.

If you want the quickest setup, Telegraf is easier to run; LinuxCNC needs more configuration.

Telegraf is growing faster right now (+54 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LinuxCNC](https://selfhost.directory/project/linuxcnc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/linuxcnc.md)
- [Telegraf](https://selfhost.directory/project/telegraf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/telegraf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/linuxcnc-vs-telegraf