# LinuxCNC vs Scada-LTS

> Two self-hosted [Industrial IoT projects](https://selfhost.directory/industrial-iot), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LinuxCNC | Scada-LTS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 2 512 ✓ | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +11 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.9.10 · 3 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

LinuxCNC scores 64/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

LinuxCNC ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

If you want the quickest setup, Scada-LTS is easier to run; LinuxCNC needs more configuration.

LinuxCNC is growing faster right now (+11 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LinuxCNC](https://selfhost.directory/project/linuxcnc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/linuxcnc.md)
- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/linuxcnc-vs-scada-lts