# LinuxCNC vs Radarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LinuxCNC | Radarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #3 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 513 | 14 672 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 | +241 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.9.10 · 3 Jul 2026 | v7.0.0.10815 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Radarr scores 78/100 against 64/100 for LinuxCNC, so it is the safer default.

Radarr ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for LinuxCNC.

If you want the quickest setup, Radarr is easier to run; LinuxCNC needs more configuration.

Radarr is growing faster right now (+241 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LinuxCNC](https://selfhost.directory/project/linuxcnc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/linuxcnc.md)
- [Radarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/linuxcnc-vs-radarr