# LinuxCNC vs RabbitMQ

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LinuxCNC | RabbitMQ |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #3 of 12 in Message Broker |
| GitHub stars | 2 512 | 13 949 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +11 | +78 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.9.10 · 3 Jul 2026 | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 64/100 for LinuxCNC, so it is the safer default.

RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for LinuxCNC.

If you want the quickest setup, RabbitMQ is easier to run; LinuxCNC needs more configuration.

RabbitMQ is growing faster right now (+78 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LinuxCNC](https://selfhost.directory/project/linuxcnc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/linuxcnc.md)
- [RabbitMQ](https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/linuxcnc-vs-rabbitmq